Loading resource…

American College of Cardiology Foundation
The paper discusses the new guideline published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) alongside the 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline and the 2020 CCS/CHRS position statement. It highlights evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice, noting both similarities and differences among the guidelines. The focus is on the integration of the latest scientific evidence, with particular attention to the role of cardiac magnetic resonance, genetic testing, and risk calculators. The document aims to identify gaps in evidence and suggest future research directions.
Sign in to open
Answers use this document only.
Your first question is free.
Resources from the same specialty and type. Curated links will replace these when added.
Documents that extend or complement this resource.

SURVIVAL AFTER INITIAL STRESS TESTING VS ANATOMIC TESTING IN SUSPECTED CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
Same clinical topic · Cardiology

PRACTICAL CARDIO-ONCOLOGY
Same clinical topic · Cardiology

OXFORD CARDIOLOGY LIBRARY: Hypertension
Same clinical topic · Cardiology

CARDIAC INVOLVEMENT IN PARASITIC INFECTIONS
Same clinical topic · Cardiology

The Athlete’s ECG
Same clinical topic · Cardiology

Antigen carbohydrate 125 as a biomarker in heart failure: a narrative review
Same clinical topic · Cardiology

Current ECG Aspects of Interatrial Block
Same clinical topic · Cardiology

Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse in 2023: Evidence-based update
Same clinical topic · Cardiology

INTERPRETING THE NORMAL PACEMAKER
Same clinical topic · Cardiology