GREAT DEBATE: CONDUCTION SYSTEM PACING WILL REPLACE CONVENTIONAL CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY

Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center; Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center; First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and

The debate focuses on the evolving landscape of cardiac resynchronization therapy, particularly the role of conduction system pacing as a potential superior alternative. Various studies are referenced to support the arguments for and against this transition in clinical practice. The document aims to provide insights into the effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcomes associated with conduction system pacing compared to traditional methods.